At least give credit when stealing article content, plz
It's already repugnant enough to jack articles and blog posts without attribution or citation of the original source, but to "massage" the content a bit -- without attribution/credit -- is even more detestable, IMHO. This happens all the time, in a variety of contexts (blogs, publishing, journalism, presentations, etc.), but that doesn't make it acceptable. Case-in-point: I was quoted in a recent MIT Technology Review piece by Robert Lemos ("Securing All Androids Proves Tricky"), discussing some facets about Android security updates, carrier and manufacturer issues, etc. This article was published on March 17, 2011. One week later, a colleague told me about my having given a similar quote on a site I've never heard of. Turns out the "Iblind Technology Blog" published a startlingly similar post to the one over at Technology Review. (Now, of course, the Technology Review article isn't mine, but I have personal interests in it (my name, my quote, my brainbeingpicked), and it still irritates me to see this sort of thing happen.)
Here's the MIT Technology Review article:
Here's the Iblind article:
Here's the MIT Technology Review article, showing my quote:
Here's the Iblind article, showing something I didn't say:
There are a few other cases where "Iblind" grabs and aggregates content from elsewhere (sans credit):
http://www.iblind.net/new-gadget-from-samsungsamsung-wave-s8500.html, snagged from http://www.gadgets-article.com/review-samsung-wave-s8500/ (note the broken English). Anyway, just another site to keep an eye on if you don't want your content ganked.






